Uzaktan Eğitim Sisteminde Şans Başarısı Kullanım Oranları

Gülgün Bulut

doi:10.5281/zenodo.6647568

Authors

Gülgün Bulut Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Uzaktan Eğitim Doktora Programı, Eskişehir / TÜRKİYE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-6207

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6647568

Keywords:

Guessing, Item Response Theory, IRT 3PL, Item Analysis, t-Test

Abstract

In this study, it has been tried to analyze how much the use of the guessing by students in distance education systems differs between men and women. Analysis within the scope of research; The study was conducted on data sets consisting of midterm and final exam results between 2013-2017 (covering 8 semesters in total) of a course whose number of students differed by semesters. According to the findings obtained from the analyzes made, it was concluded that the rate of guessing in exams of the students who received education from distance education systems did not differ significantly between women and men.

References

Adedoyin, O. O. (2010). Using IRT approach to detect gender biased items in public examinations: A case study from the Botswana junior certificate examination in Mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(7), 385-399.

Akyıldız, M. & Şahin, M. D. (2017). Açıköğretimde kullanılan sınavlardan Klasik Test Kuramına ve Madde Tepki Kuramına göre elde edilen yetenek ölçülerinin karşılaştırılması, Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (AUAd), 3(4), 141-159.

Akyıldız, M. (2015). Açıköğretim Fakültesi 2014/2015 Öğretim Yılı Sınavlarından, Madde Tepki Kuramı ve Klasik Test Kuramına Göre Kestirilen Yetenek Ölçülerinin Karşılaştırılması, Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi, Proje no: 1503E094.

An, X. & Yung, Y. F. (2014). Item response theory: what it is and how you can use the IRT procedure to apply it. SAS Institute Inc. SAS364-2014.

Baker, F. B. (2001). The basic of item response theory. USA: ERIC.

Betz, N. E., & Turner, B. M. (2011). Using item response theory and adaptive testing in online career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 19(3), 274-286.

Bock, R. D. (1997). A brief history of item response theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and practice, 16, 21–23.

Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction classical and modern test theory. USA: CBS College Publishing Company.

Çelen, Ü. & Çıkrıkçı Demirtaşlı, N. (2006). Düzeltme yönergesinin testin psikometrik özelliklerine etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 82-91.

Demars, C. (2010). Item response theory: Understanding statistics measurement. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

Embretson, S. E. & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Hambelton, R. K. (1994). Item Response theory: a broad psychometric framework for measurement advances. Psicothema, 6(3), 535-556.

Hambleton, R.K. & Swaminathan, H. (2013). Item response theory, New York: Springer Science+Business Media

Kean, J. & Reilly, J. (2014). Item response theory. Handbook for Clinical Research: Design, Statistics and Implementation. (pp. 195-198). New York, NY: Demos Medical Publishing.

Lord, F. M. (1962). Formula scoring and validity, Research Bulten (May) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1962.tb00290.x

Świst, K., Skórska, P., Koniewski, M. & Jasińska-Maciążek, A. (2015). Sex differences in guessing and item omission. EDUKACJA, 134(3), 50-64.

Umay, A. (1998). Seçmeli testlerde yanıtlayıcı davranışları ve şans başarısının elimine edilmesi işlemlerine ilişkin bazı öneriler, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 54-61.

van der Linden, W. J. & Hambleton, R.K. (1996). Handbook of modern ıtem response theory, ABD: Springer.